UK Faces Renewed Negotiations Over Chagos Islands Deal

The future of the Chagos Islands has once again become a point of contention, as the UK and Mauritius enter renewed negotiations over sovereignty and lease agreements. Last October, the UK announced plans to transfer sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius while retaining a 99-year lease on the strategic military base on Diego Garcia. However, the recent election of Mauritian Prime Minister Navin Ramgoolam has shifted the dynamics of the Chagos Islands deal, with Mauritius seeking to renegotiate the financial terms.

Ramgoolam claims the newly proposed conditions will link the UK’s lease payments to inflation and introduce frontloaded payments, ensuring Mauritius receives more financial security in the early years of the agreement. This has led to speculation that the UK’s costs could potentially double from previous estimates. While some reports suggest figures as high as £18 billion, the UK Foreign Office has firmly dismissed these claims, labelling them “inaccurate and misleading,” and asserting that any deal signed will serve the UK’s national interest.

Despite these assurances, the renegotiation has sparked considerable debate within the UK government. Senior figures have expressed frustration, describing the deal as “madness” and questioning how such significant sums could be justified at a time of economic strain. Critics argue that committing billions to this deal, particularly when it involves ceding control over strategically important territory, is a questionable use of public funds.

Ramgoolam remains confident that the renegotiated deal will be approved, stating that the previous agreement was a “sell-out” for Mauritius and failed to account for long-term economic realities like inflation. He also suggested that under the revised deal, the UK would no longer be able to unilaterally extend its lease beyond the initial 99 years, a claim the UK government has strongly denied.

Opposition voices in the UK, including high-profile political figures, have called for greater transparency around the Chagos Islands deal. There are growing concerns that the British public, and even members of Parliament, are being left in the dark about the full implications of the agreement. The lack of clarity has fuelled speculation and further criticism, with calls for the Prime Minister to address Parliament directly.

The Chagos Islands have been at the centre of a longstanding dispute. The UK took control of the islands from Mauritius in 1965, evicting over 1,000 residents to establish the military base on Diego Garcia. While Mauritius gained independence in 1968, it has consistently maintained that the Chagos Islands are rightfully its territory. International legal opinions and rulings have increasingly supported Mauritius’s claim, putting further pressure on the UK to resolve the issue. The International Court of Justice has previously ruled that the UK’s administration of the Chagos Islands is unlawful, adding further pressure to resolve the sovereignty dispute (ICJ Advisory Opinion).

As the renegotiations continue, the outcome will have significant implications not only for UK-Mauritius relations but also for broader international dynamics, particularly given the strategic importance of Diego Garcia to UK and US military interests. For now, both sides appear firm in their positions, leaving the final terms of the agreement—and the financial cost to British taxpayers—hanging in the balance.

For more updates on the Chagos Islands and further insights, visit EyeOnLondon. We’d love to hear your views in the comments.

Follow us on:

Subscribe to our YouTube channel for the latest videos and updates!

We value your thoughts! Share your feedback and help us make EyeOnLondon even better!